Site reviews and corrective actions — organised

The problem

Good stations run internal quality reviews — checking equipment, testers, premises and processes. The evidence usually ends up in Word documents, email threads and filing cabinets. When you need to show a history of reviews and actions, assembling it takes time.

How MOT Lens handles it

• Structured reviews — capture findings per VTS with dates and categories.
• Corrective actions — record what needs doing, who's responsible, and when it's due.
• Follow-ups — track progress without chasing emails.
• Evidence history — previous reviews stay accessible and linked to the site.
• Connected to equipment and quality — reviews reference the same equipment register and tester records.

Important

These are your internal management records. MOT Lens does not prescribe a specific review frequency — that's your decision based on your site's needs and any DVSA guidance.

Example workflow

1. Start a site review in MOT Lens.
2. Record findings against categories (equipment, premises, testers, processes).
3. Create corrective actions with owners and due dates.
4. Mark actions complete as they're resolved.
5. The review history builds over time for the site.

Who this is for

• AEs conducting internal reviews
• Site managers responsible for premises and processes
• Quality leads documenting improvement activity

Related

• Equipment
• Quality & QC
• Tester management